Pasar al contenido principal

Gobierno y Emprendimiento Público

Sobre el Grupo

El grupo trabaja en los retos más apremiantes para nuestra sociedad, incluidos salud, cambio climático, desarrollo económico, seguridad e inteligencia artificial. Los integrantes del grupo desarrollan investigación aplicada para soportar procesos de debate y discusión sobre políticas y decisiones públicas, así como nuevos métodos de investigación para abordar estos problemas.

El trabajo de nuestro grupo en estas áreas busca responder las siguientes preguntas de investigación en cada una de estas líneas:

• ¿Qué tipo subsistemas constituyen a una ciudad? ¿Cómo interactúan y cómo pueden ser monitoreados? ¿Cómo podemos emplear ese conocimiento para desarrollar ciudades más inclusivas y sostenibles?
• ¿Qué tipo de estructura de red existe en la economía y cómo cambia en el tiempo? ¿Qué tipo de información y modelos podemos emplear para explorar de manera cuantitativa su comportamiento? ¿Es posible desarrollar políticas tecnológicas que aprovechen este conocimiento para cumplir objetivos de desarrollo específico?
• ¿Cómo podemos emplear los métodos computacionales modernos para estudiar sistemas sociales? ¿Qué tipo de patrones emergen cuando analizamos el comportamiento de sistemas sociales bajo millones de distintas suposiciones acerca de su estructura? ¿Cómo podemos emplear estos métodos para distribuir de manera más eficiente los recursos de la sociedad y la naturaleza? ¿Cómo podemos emplear estos métodos para atender las causas de la desigualdad y la pobreza?
• ¿Qué procesos neuronales y cognitivos describen la toma de decisiones agentes públicos? ¿Es posible emplear métodos computacionales para soportar procesos de decisión de manera efectiva? ¿Cuáles son las disyuntivas clave en nuestros grandes debates nacionales?

 

Líneas de investigación

• Ciencia de Ciudades
• Ciencia de Redes y Complejidad
• Ciencias Sociales Computacionales
• Ciencia de Decisiones
• Emprendimiento Público
• Política Pública y Gobierno

Líder

Edmundo Molina Pérez - edmundo.molina@tec.mx

 

Miembros

Adolfo Javier De Unanue Tiscareño
Alejandra Macias
Alejandro Alfonso Poiré Romero
Carlos Elizondo Mayer Serra
Edgar Arturo Barroso Merino
Fabián Lozano García
Fernando Gómez
Grisel Ayllon
Isaac Molina
Hilda Zamora
Grisel Olivera
Gustavo Merino  
Luis Alberto Serra Barragán
Roberto Durán Fernández
Roberto Ponce López
Zeus Hiram Zamora Guevara

 

Publicaciones más relevantes

• Ponce-Lopez, Roberto, and Joseph Ferreira Jr. Identifying and characterizing popular non-work destinations by clustering cellphone and point-of-interest data. Cities 113 (2021): 103158.

• He, He, Roberto Ponce-Lopez, Jingsi Shaw, Diem-Trinh Le, Joseph Ferreira, and P. Christopher Zegras. Representing accessibility: Evidence from vehicle ownership choices and property valuations in Singapore. Transportation Research Record 2673, no. 2 (2019): 724-733.

• Basu, Rounaq, Joseph Ferreira, and Roberto Ponce-Lopez. A framework to generate virtual cities as sandboxes for land use-transport interaction models. Journal of Transport and Land Use 14, no. 1 (2021): 303-323.

• Olivera-Martínez, Grissel, and Adelaido García-Andrés. Infraestructura hospitalaria y personal médico del Sistema Público de Salud en México ante la pandemia por COVID-19. Ciencias Administrativas. Teoría y Praxis 17, no. 2 (2021): 85-105.

• Gómez-Zaldívar, Fernando, and Edmundo Molina-Perez. Evolution of the Productive Capabilities of Mexico: Economic Complexity Analysis for the Development of Special Economic Zones (SEZ). The International Trade Journal 35, no. 1 (2021): 4-18.

• Estrada, Luis, and Alejandro Poiré. The Mexican standoff: taught to protest, learning to lose. Journal of Democracy 18, no. 1 (2007): 73-87.

• Groves, David G., Edmundo Molina-Perez, Evan Bloom, and Jordan R. Fischbach. Robust Decision Making (RDM): Application to Water Planning and Climate Policy. In Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty, pp. 135-163. Springer, Cham, 2019.

• Serra-Barragán, Luis, Edmundo Molina-Perez, and Zeus Guevara. Energy and Environmental Policy and Economic Development. In Energy Issues and Transition to a Low Carbon Economy, pp. 31-57. Springer, Cham, 2022.

• Molina-Perez, E., Esquivel-Flores, O. A., & Zamora-Maldonado, H. (2020). Computational Intelligence for Studying Sustainability Challenges: Tools and Methods for Dealing With Deep Uncertainty and Complexity. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 111.

• Zamora-Maldonado, Hilda Consuelo, Véronique Sophie Avila-Foucat, Víctor Gelasio Sánchez-Sotomayor, and Raymond Lee. Social-ecological Resilience Modeling: Water Stress Effects in the Bighorn Sheep Management System in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Ecological Complexity 45 (2021): 100884.

 

Proyectos más relevantes

• URBAN SPRAWL IN MONTERREY
Founder: Fundación FEMSA
Líder: Dr. Roberto Ponce
This project investigates the process of urban sprawl in Monterrey, quantifying the amount of land consumed and delving into the cost estimation of this pattern of urbanization for the public finances of the city. The project oversees the causes and consequences of urban sprawl in Mexico. Learn more here: https://www.expansionurbanamty.mx/

• An Implementation of SLEUTH as an Open Platform for Doing Scenario Planning to Predict Urban Growth
Founder: Fundación FEMSA
Líder: Dr. Roberto Ponce
This project proposes a ready to use implementation of a cellular automata for scenario planning applied to urban growth. The most observed geographical pattern of growth characterizing fast growing cities is sprawling. The urban land consumption per capita significantly increased, on average, in cities over the 1990-2000 and 2000 and 2014 periods, according to the Atlas of Urban Expansion. Urban sprawl has dire consequences on miles per vehicle traveled, CO2 and the provision of public services. The evidence has shown that reversing this trend requires decisive policy actions from local governments. The problem is that local governments, especially in developing countries, do not possess the human capital, technical proficiency and financial resources to develop a sophisticated and easy to test policy interventions under a framework of scenario planning. Our project addresses such limitations by reimplementing the SLEUTH model/ simulator developed by Keith C. Clarke, a tool for predicting urban growth that is well established in the literature.   

We have reimplemented the SLEUTH model/simulator to increase the access of local governments to scenario planning for urban growth through an easy and ready to use digital tool that works with open access data. SLEUTH is a cellular automaton that simulates 3 growth processes: spontaneous growth, edge growth, and road influence growth. Each growth phase is controlled by a set of parameters calibrated using past growth data. Three are the main limitations of current implementations of SLEUTH to be widely used by local governments and regions. First, the code of most implementations is written in C++, and does not follow modern and best practices for coding. Second, the model needs to be fed with satellite imagery and raster files on historic urbanized land, elevations, and roads access. Third, the process of calibrating the parameters to historical data is long, tedious, and not automated. These three elements are a barrier of entry for local governments without a developed technical capacity to do scenario planning for urban growth.

To address these limitations in SLEUTH, we built an interactive digital platform that performs remote data integration from Google Earth Engine to feed the satellite imagery and rasters into the SLEUTH model in an automated way, allowing a real time exploration of SLEUTH generated scenarios. We reimplemented SLEUTH program in Python to better integration with modern data formats and frameworks and facilitate experimenting and new feature development for SLEUTH based growth models.  We tested new calibration methods based on machine learning to improve SLEUTH's calibration speed. The platform simulates growth for all major cities in Latin America in an automated way, relying on open access platforms and data.

• Latin American Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Líder: Dr. Edmundo Molina
Founder: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo
RAND and Tecnológico de Monterrey have partnered to evaluate decarbonization plans in Costa Rica and Chile in recent years . In these studies, the research team applied Robust Decision Making (RDM) to develop and evaluate different scenarios of emissions with and without the implementation of the decarbonization actions roughly consistent with the countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). These studies then identified the key conditions that would lead the decarbonization strategies to hit or miss their emissions objectives.

This proposed study builds upon these two successful studies by (a) leveraging the tools already developed and (b) advancing our approach based on the many lessons learned. The study proposes to develop a novel integrated Latin America decarbonization model that estimates emissions and decarbonization net benefits by sector and country under a wide range of regional and country-specific futures. For example, our integrated model would ensure that consistent assumptions are made for factors that affect Latin American countries similarly, such as similar costs of imported technology. Then, RDM and this model will be used to develop plausible decarbonization pathways for each Latin American country, and the region as a whole, and identify the key uncertain trends that must be monitored and managed in order for the region to meet net zero emissions by 2050.

The research team of Tecnológico de Monterrey will assist the RAND team on carrying out stakeholder engagements, implementing the RDM framework and on gathering the needed information for estimating emissions and decarbonization net benefits, or to develop proxy approaches in the absence of data. This information will be integrated into the RDM-informed modeling and analysis. The final product will be based on an integrated analysis; in addition, the individual country modeling components will be shared with each country for their continued development and use.

• Advise and Support in LTS Exploratory Modeling to Support Countries in LTO Exploration and LTS Modeling
Líder: Dr. Edmundo Molina
Founder: Banco Mundial
Tecnologico de Monterrey will support the World Bank’s programmatic ASA, Long-term Low-Carbon Planning in Pilot Countries providing an exploratory decarbonization platform that can be used to estimate greenhouse gas emissions pathways for specific countries, based on the multi-sectorial specification of decarbonization strategies, and the estimation of the associated implementation costs and resulting broader societal benefits. Additionally, this platform will help the World Bank team explore how these pathways, costs and benefits vary with respect to different assumptions about long-term socio-economic, technological, and environmental conditions, as well as with respect to implementation progress of decarbonization strategies.

This effort will focus on five countries,  including Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, Uzbekistan and Dominican Republic. The TdM team will assembly the datasets required for carrying out the analyses and assist the World Bank team in configuring the modeling platform to the needs of each nation case study. The TdM team will also support the adoption of this platform by the World Bank team so they can use it more flexibly and update the analysis as needed.

• A cognitive modeling approach for understanding computational intelligence-human interactions in uncertain and complex decision-making environments
Líder: Dr. Edmundo Molina
Founder: US Air Force
Decision-making in complex and uncertain environments is a high-level individual or group process that depends on various cognitive, psychological, and social mechanisms, such as perception, attention, memory, abstract thinking, and debate. In particular, uncertain and complex environment require series of decisions to be made, with each decision depending on rapidly changing information, complex computational intelligence tools (CITs), detailed data analysis tasks and multiple agents’ perspectives.

There is limited empirical evidence that analyzes how CITs interact with decision makers in critical decision-making situations or that describes the cognitive and neurological mechanisms through which CITs influence individuals’ integrative complexity traits. We also do not have sufficient information that describes how is that CITs’ characteristics interact with decision makers’ own characteristics (e.g., group size, age, field of expertise). Finally, little is known about the potential externalities that CITs may have on decision-making in these types of environments, such as overreliance, mistrust, or model rejection.

To address these knowledge gaps, this study proposes to combine behavioral experimentation and neuroscientific methods to develop a cognitive model that describes the impact that CITs have on decisions being made in complex and uncertain environments. In particular, this study seeks to address the following research questions:

What is the marginal impact of CITs’ components on individuals’ cognitive bandwidth in complex and uncertain decision-making environments?
What is the marginal impact of CITs’ components on individuals’ level of integrative complexity in complex and uncertain decision-making environments?  
Under which combination of experimental parameters CITs have a positive impact on decision makers’ ability to deal with complex and uncertain environments?  
Under which combination of experimental parameters CITs impact positively individuals’ level of integrative complexity when dealing with a ambiguous or deeply uncertain problem?
Under which combination of experimental parameters CITs lead to mistrust, technological overreliance, model rejection or gridlock in complex and uncertain environments?  
Can the lessons learned in these experiments be generalized across different decision context?
This interdisciplinary approach can contribute to: i) objectively illustrate decision makers’ models of beliefs and values,, ii) identify the impact and mechanisms through which CITs influence individuals’ integrative complexity traits, iii) support CITs interventions in crisis situations, and iv) contribute to the development of modern decision sciences. Ultimately, this integrative approach can result in formal cognitive models of decision making under uncertainty and complexity that will grant the scientific community a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which CITs and decision makers interact under rapidly evolving environments.